Search Results for "penalty under Excise Rules"

418 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 418 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Penalty on Company Officials Under CGST Act Due to Lack of Personal Liability Evidence and Procedural Flaws. Petitioners Challenge Penalty Order for Fake Input Tax Credit Allegations

The petitioners, employees of M/s. Shemaroo Entertainment Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order-in-original dated 1 February 2025 that i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.19366 OF 2024

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 35-G of Central Excise Act, 1944. CESTAT Orders Not Appealable to High Court as They Do Not Involve Questions of Law.

The Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs filed two appeals under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against orders of the Customs, Excis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Central Excise Appeal in Purification Activity Case — Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Judicial Indiscipline. Purification of excise duty paid goods on job work basis does not amount to manufacture under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Tribunal bound by precedents.

The Bombay High Court disposed of Central Excise Appeal No.179 of 2014 and Civil Writ Petition No.279 of 2015 by a common order. The appellant, Sunbel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against CESTAT Predeposit Order in Central Excise Clandestine Removal Cases. Electricity Consumption Norms for M.S. Ingots Require Prima Facie Case Assessment for Waiver of Predeposit.

The Bombay High Court heard six appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against a common order of the Customs, Excise and Service T...