Search Results for "payee's bank account"

359 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 359 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case, Reduces Fine Amount. Accused failed to rebut presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 regarding cheque issued for repayment of loan.

The case arises from a complaint filed by M/s. Meenakshi Developers (respondent/complainant) against Sri V.V. Chari (petitioner/accused) under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Passes Judgment in Appeal Against Acquittal Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Whether a Cheque Issued as Security Attracts Liability Under Section 138 Remains the Central Question.

The appeal before the High Court of Bombay at Goa arose from a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The appellant, Goa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Complaint in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Existent Debt — Loan Allegedly Advanced in 1996 Not Legally Recoverable as Time-Barred Debt Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

The petitioner, accused in C.C. No.35622/2010 for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed a petition under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted by accused.

The appellant, Dr. Kailash Charkha, was the original complainant in Summary Criminal Case 160 of 2004 before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Time-Barred Debt. Conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Set Aside as Complainant Failed to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt.

The petitioner, T.C. Chandraiah, was the accused in Criminal Case No.433/2013 before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Channapatna, for an offence unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Summary Suit — Defendant's Vague Defence of Security Cheques Not a Triable Issue. The court upheld the decree for Rs.61,00,000/- with interest under Order 37 CPC, as the defendant failed to disclose a plausible defence.

The respondent/plaintiff, Pravin Hiralal Shah, filed a summary suit against the appellant/defendant, Rajesh Laxmichand Udeshi @Bhatia, for recovery of...