Search Results for "model employer"

357 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 357 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Over Reinstatement for Daily Wage Employee in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Refusal of reinstatement and back wages upheld as employee worked only for 4 years and compensation of Rs. 25,000 deemed adequate under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Jagdish s/o Karuji Bombarde, was a daily wage employee of the Municipal Council, Tumsar. He was appointed in February 1997, transferre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.

The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recognition of Trade Union Under Section 11 of MRTU & PULP Act. Membership Verification Based on Employer's Records Upheld as Proper.

The petitioner, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, challenged an order of the Industrial Court declarin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Company's Petition and Dismisses Workmen's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Industrial Court's Finding of Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 6 Upheld, but Direction for Permanent Status Set Aside for Workmen Not Proving 240 Days Service Under Item 9.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from an order of the Industrial Court, Pune, in Complaint (ULP) Nos.169 of 1993 and 493 of 1993. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Employee Seeking Reinstatement Beyond Age 60 — Employee Not Covered Under BIR Act as He Was Not an 'Employee' Under Section 3(13).

The appellant, Shri Vithal Bakula Kokate, was initially appointed as a Learner by Podar Mills in 1966 and later promoted to various positions, ultimat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. Petitioner failed to establish employer-employee relationship with respondent company as he was engaged through a contractor.

The petitioner, M.G. Bhide, filed a complaint before the Industrial Court at Pune under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of ...