Search Results for "mineral development"

338 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 338 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in MMDR Act Cases Due to Lack of Authorisation. Police Registration of FIR for Mining Offences Without Competent Authority's Complaint Held Invalid Under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

A batch of criminal petitions was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Rejection of Mining Lease Application. Writ of Mandamus Denied as Re-grant Notification Lapsed and No Vested Right Exists.

The petitioner, M/s. Sunvik Steels Pvt Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to set aside an ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Mining Offences Under MMDR Act and IPC. Prosecution Under MMDR Act Requires Complaint by Authorized Officer; Police FIR Without Authority is Illegal.

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad dealt with a batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Revocation of Environmental Clearance for Granite Quarrying Near Bannerghatta National Park. Environmental Clearance Restored as Eco-Sensitive Zone Notification dated 11.03.2020 Limits Mining Prohibition to Notified 100-Meter Zone, Not One-Kilometer Buffer.

The petitioner, owner of patta land in Herandyapanahalli Village, Kanakapura Taluk, was granted a work order on 14.01.2016 under Rule 32(1) of the Kar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Quarrying Lease Renewal in Forest Area. Court upholds rejection on ground that land is classified as forest and requires prior approval under Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

The judgment involves two writ petitions filed by Dhananjay and M/s. Shilpi Granite Exports challenging the rejection of their applications for renewa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Release of Seized Minerals in Forest Offence Case — Petitioner Failed to Establish Ownership and Transport Permits Were Invalid

The petitioner, a partner in Srinivasa Minerals Trading Company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking...