Search Results for "locus standi"

Trending :

Search Results for "locus standi"

1144 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1144 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Dismissed Employee Seeking Action Against Transport Corporation Officials — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi as Disciplinary Proceedings Already Initiated.

3 Jun 2026

The petitioner, S. Murugesan, a dismissed employee of the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reviews Order Directing Liquidator to Accept Sale Proceeds in Insolvency Case. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India Challenges Writ Order Alleging Irregularities in Auction Process Under IBC.

15 Dec 2025

The review petition was filed by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) under Section 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civ...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows EPFO's Writ Petition Challenging EPF Appellate Tribunal Order for Lack of Jurisdiction and Erroneous Application of Mens Rea. The Tribunal's order quashed as it entertained a time-barred appeal without condonation of delay and wrongly applied criminal law concepts to civil damages under Section 14B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

2 Jan 2025

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Employees Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) challenging an order of the Employees Provident Fund Appel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to Lack of Locus Standi and Erroneous Lapse Declaration. Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Challenge Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Possession Was Taken, Precluding Lapse.

16 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from a land acquisition initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with a notification dated 17.06.2005 and declaration under S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Nomination of Non-OBC Members to Municipal Council. Holds That Section 47 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 Does Not Require Nominated Members to Belong to OBC Category.

4 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Jagdish Samanpelliwar, filed four writ petitions challenging the nomination of respondents 4 in each petition as members of the Kinwat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Seeking Collegium Transparency in Judicial Appointments — Petition Lacks Cause of Action and Public Interest. Petitioners Failed to Demonstrate Any Personal Injury or Public Wrong, and the Petition Was Vague and Not Maintainable Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

4 Sep 2018

The petitioners, Aravinda Kamath Puttur, V.L. Jagadish, and Prashanth Murthy P., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appellant in Writ Appeal Seeking Removal of Special Public Prosecutor in Disproportionate Assets Appeals. Engagement of Special Public Prosecutor by Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, a Party to the Appeals, Held Not to Suffer from Conflict of Interest or Bias under Section 24(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

11 Feb 2015

Background: The case arose from appeals against conviction in a high-profile disproportionate assets case involving a former Chief Minister of Tamil N...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Passes Common Order in Multiple Section 482 CrPC Petitions Seeking Quashing of FIRs in Alleged Corruption Case. The Accused, Including Public Servants, Argue That the Private Complaints Filed by an Advocate-RTI Activist and Resulting FIRs Are Without Basis and Seek to Invoke Inherent Jurisdiction.

28 Oct 2014

...

High Court

KAHC010179582014_1

28 Oct 2014

Thirteen criminal petitions were filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the High Court of Karnataka, challenging order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved and Suit Barred by Limitation. Plaintiff failed to prove execution of agreement and suit was filed beyond three years from notice of refusal under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Sandeep Kashinath Parab, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 15/06/1998 allegedly executed by the respo...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)