Search Results for "international commercial dispute"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "international commercial dispute"

1241 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1241 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Rehears Interlocutory Applications in Trademark Dispute for Interim Injunction. Court Directed to Apply Trinity Tests and Consider Section 12-A Compliance and Order 2 Rule 2 Bar After Remand by Division Bench.

5 Feb 2025

The Madras High Court reheard two interlocutory applications in a commercial suit involving a trademark dispute over the 'Massey Ferguson' brand. Trac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Appeal Against Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award in Family Business Dispute. Dispute Centers on Inclusion of Agricultural Lands Held by Individual Family Members in Family Asset Separation Process.

14 Jun 2013

The appeal arose from a family dispute within the Malhotra family of Pune, who owned and controlled several businesses including Weikfield Products Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Preservation of Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai — Directs Restoration of Earmarked Land and Cancellation of Allotment to Private Developer. Land reserved since 2003 under Government Resolution dated 26 March 2003 for a Government Sports Complex cannot be diverted for commercial purposes; shifting the complex to a remote rural area 115 km away is arbitrary.

1 Jul 2024

The Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of CID...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Filing Arbitration Application Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Dispute Centers on Whether Limitation Runs from Original Award or Belated Correction Order When Section 33 Application Filed Beyond 30 Days.

15 Jul 2022

The writ petitions challenged the order of the Commercial Court condoning the delay in filing arbitration suits under Section 34 of the Arbitration an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment on Appeal Against Order of Civil Imprisonment and Compensation Under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC in Trade Mark Infringement Suit. The Court Considers Whether the Ex Parte Injunction Survived Transfer of Suit and Whether Use of 'MAHE' and 'Manipal Groups' Constituted Willful Disobedience.

17 Jul 2023

The appeal arose from an order dated 28.09.2022 passed by the Commercial Court, Bengaluru Rural District, in Commercial Misc. No.246/2021, holding the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Appointment Application for Lack of Jurisdiction — Venue Designation in Lease Agreement Does Not Confer Seat of Arbitration. Court holds that mere mention of 'venue' in arbitration clause without specifying 'seat' does not vest jurisdiction in courts at the venue, especially when subject matter lies outside its territorial limits.

21 Mar 2023

The applicant, Honey Bee Multitrading Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in mustard oil manufacturing with its plant in Ganganagar, Rajasthan, entered into ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Unilateral Appointment Clause Not Barred as Respondent Failed to Respond to Invocation Notice.

27 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Uttam Energy Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitral...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Share Purchase Agreement Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's findings on fraud, jurisdiction, and liability, rejecting allegations of perversity and violation of natural justice.

28 Sep 2015

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Avitel Post Studioz Ltd. and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Prima Facie Case and Guilty of Iniquitous Conduct. The court upheld the Single Judge's refusal of interim injunction under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Copyright Act, 1957, finding suppression of facts and lack of evidence of ownership.

6 Apr 2026

The present Commercial Appeal was filed by Laser Shaving India Pvt Ltd (the original plaintiff) against the order dated 25/06/2025 passed by the learn...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favour of Contractor in Postal Department Contract Dispute — Claims for Idle Labour, Machinery, and Loss of Profit Held Not Supported by Evidence and Contrary to Contract Terms. The court held that an arbitrator cannot award damages for idle resources or loss of profit without proof of deployment or anticipated profits, and such awards are perverse and patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Feb 2020

The Petitioner, Union of India through the Postal Department, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challen...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)