Search Results for "interest disallowed"

485 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 485 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in RERA Execution Case, Holding Order XXI Rule 32(5) CPC Applicable. The court set aside the Appellate Tribunal's order disallowing amendment to execution applications seeking construction by decree holders at promoter's cost.

The case involves five second appeals filed by allottees (Rajan Chandiramani, Jagruti Parikh and Anr., Priyanka Waghela, Srichand Makhija, and Jayesh ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Interim Application in Copyright Suit Over Film 'Adipurush' — Credit Already Granted in Character Assets. Court holds that once credit is given, the grievance is addressed and no interim relief is necessary.

The plaintiff, Trishul Media Entertainment, filed a Commercial IPR Suit and Interim Application seeking ad-interim relief including credit in the film...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Tax Appeal in Sesa Industries Limited v. Commissioner of Income-tax: Profit from Sale of Slag, a By-product in Pig Iron Manufacture, is Eligible for Deduction Under Section 80-IB of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Sesa Industries Limited, an assessee under the Income-tax Act, 1961, filed a tax appeal under Section 260-A against the order of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Recovery Suit — Concurrent Findings on Unauthorised Use of Premises Upheld. Damages Awarded for Use and Occupation of Suit Schedule Property Based on Oral and Documentary Evidence.

The respondent/plaintiff instituted Original Suit No.232/1998 on 23.09.1998 before the I Addl. Senior Civil Judge at Belgaum seeking a decree for reco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tax Appeals in Income Tax Case — Commission and Deposit Additions Upheld as Findings of Fact. No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Vijay Narayandas Rizwani, was an assessee carrying on business of distribution of country liquor. For the assessment year 1994-95, he f...