Search Results for "frivolous suit"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "frivolous suit"

734 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 734 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Family Property Dispute — Land Sold Without Consent of Co-Owners. Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 44 — Co-owner cannot transfer undivided share to stranger without consent of other co-owners.

23 Jan 2026

The present appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 27.12.2019 passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Umbergaon, in Special Civil ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Execution Objection Case — Upholds Summary Rejection of Objection Petition Under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC. Executing Court Not Required to Adjudicate Title When Objection is Frivolous and Collusive.

17 Nov 2025

The appellant, Kamal W/o Vishwanath Jadhav, filed a second appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 11.09.2025 passed by the first appellate C...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that second appeal under Section 100 CPC cannot be entertained on questions of fact when lower courts have concurrently found that the suit property is not joint family property and that the plaintiffs failed to prove title.

6 Jul 2023

The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was filed by the appellants (original plaintiffs) against th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition to Quash Compromise Decree in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction — Held That Compromise Decree Was Not Validly Passed as It Was Based on a Consent Term That Was Contrary to Law and Without Jurisdiction.

5 Jun 2023

The case involves a dispute over property ownership. The original petitioner, Narhar Rango Kulkarni (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), file...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Not Barred Under Section 34 When Challenge is to Mortgage Validity and Bank's Actions, Not Recovery Proceedings. The court held that the bar under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act does not apply to a suit seeking declaration of title and challenging the validity of a mortgage, as such issues are not within the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

16 Jul 2021

The appellant, Smt. Nanjamma, filed a civil suit (O.S.No.3780/2017) before the XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, seeking a dec...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Property Declaration Suits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Appellants failed to prove title and possession; no substantial question of law arose under Section 100 CPC.

20 Dec 2019

The judgment pertains to two Regular First Appeals (R.F.A.No.784/2013 and R.F.A.No.785/2013) filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtor in Execution Proceedings - Order XXI Rule 29 CPC Stay Application Rejected as Suit Not Pending in Same Court. Suit for Injunction Filed by Legal Representatives of Deceased Judgment Debtor Cannot Stay Execution of Decree Attained Finality Up to Supreme Court as Requirements of Order XXI Rule 29 Not Met.

1 Mar 2018

The dispute arose from a suit for specific performance and cancellation of a sale deed (RCS No. 319 of 2000) filed by late Balu Bhuji Lale against Ana...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Trustees to Prosecute Eviction Suit Despite Court Receiver's Appointment — Leave Held Not Required for Period When Receiver Was Not in Possession. The Court held that since the Court Receiver was never in actual possession of the suit flat, the Applicants did not require leave to continue the RAE Suit under Section 80 CPC.

16 Jun 2015

The Applicants, as Trustees under an Indenture of Trust dated 6th October 1937, are the owners and landlords of a building known as 'Dhun Abad' at 106...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Impleadment of Tenant in Eviction Suit — Applicant Claiming Tenancy Rights Has Direct Interest in Subject Matter. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Allows Impleadment of Party Whose Rights Would Be Affected by Outcome of Suit for Possession.

22 Apr 2013

The Petitioner, original Plaintiff, filed a suit (S.C. Suit No.1830 of 2010) in the City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai, against Respondent Nos.1 and 2 (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares Respondent Vexatious Litigant Under Maharashtra Vexatious Litigation (Prevention) Act, 1971 for Habitually Filing Baseless Proceedings Against Tenant. Landlord-Tenant Dispute Leads to Declaration of Vexatious Litigant Due to Habitual Filing of Frivolous Applications and Abusive Conduct.

6 May 2011

The Advocate General for the State of Maharashtra filed a petition under Section 2(1) of the Maharashtra Vexatious Litigation (Prevention) Act, 1971, ...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)