Search Results for "federal purpose"

597 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 597 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Authorities in Madras Urban Land Tax Act — Act Held Constitutionally Valid. Levy of 0.4% on Market Value of Urban Land Under Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966 Not Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(f), and Retrospective Operation Reasonable.

The case concerned the constitutional validity of the Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966, which levied a tax on urban land at 0.4% of its market value. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Corporate Debtor Against Banks in SARFAESI Act Proceedings — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act as Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 Before DRT Exists.

The appellant, Kingfisher Airlines Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, had availed various credit facilities from a consortiu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Sushant Singh Rajput Death Case — Holds That Bihar Police Had Jurisdiction to Register FIR and CBI Investigation Is Lawful

The Supreme Court dismissed a transfer petition filed by Rhea Chakraborty seeking transfer of FIR No. 241 of 2020 registered at Patna, Bihar, to Mumba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Examines Whether Settlement Commission Erred in Not Considering Export Performance During Extended Period in EPCG Duty Case. Appellant Sought Recalculation of Customs Duty Based on 30% Export Obligation Achieved, Arguing That One-Year Extension Was Not Properly Accounted.

The appellant, M/s. Asianet Satellite Communication Limited, a service provider in television network, imported cable TV equipment valued at Rs.6,14,3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case — Notification 8/2005-ST Held Conditional. CESTAT order setting aside demand against assessee upheld as notification required fulfillment of conditions for exemption.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore-II, filed appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging a common order dated 12...