Search Results for "ex-parte enquiry"

133 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 133 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Domestic Violence Case — Sets Aside Appellate Order for Non-Compliance with Section 29 of D.V. Act. Appellate Court Failed to Provide Opportunity of Hearing to Complainant Before Setting Aside Conviction Order.

The petitioner, Smt. Roopa B.C., filed a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (D.V. Act) against her ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Ex-parte Decree Set Aside Due to Improper Service of Summons. First Appellate Court's Order Restored as Trial Court Failed to Comply with Order V Rule 17 CPC.

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of contract (O.S.No.126/2007) alleging that the respondent/defendant executed an agreeme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Upholds Award for Driver Injured in Auto-Rickshaw Accident. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Lack of Written Contract; Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The case involves an appeal by the United India Insurance Co. Ltd. against an award dated 08.06.2009 passed by the Labour Officer and Commissioner for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition Challenging Gratuity Order Due to Alternate Remedy. Employer failed to avail statutory appeal under Section 7(7) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, hence writ petition not maintainable.

The petitioner, Chanda Khand Sahakari Shetkari Kharedi Vikri Sanstha, was the employer of respondent No.1, Dattatraya Ramchandra Gaund, who was appoin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Impleadment Application in Property Suit — Plaintiffs Fail to Establish Prima Facie Title or Possession. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC requires direct legal interest; vague claims of possession without documentary evidence insufficient for impleadment.

The judgment pertains to a Notice of Motion filed by the plaintiffs in a suit seeking a declaration of ownership and possession of a property. The pla...