Search Results for "erroneous and prejudicial"

172 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 172 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Company Petition — Interim Relief Granted to Restrain Alienation of Property. Balance of convenience favored grant of ad-interim relief to protect subject matter of petition under Sections 397, 398 of Companies Act, 1956.

The present appeal arises from a Company Petition No. 149 of 2012 filed under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956, alleging oppression and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Right to Representation. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Infringed Due to Non-Supply of Grounds in Understandable Language and Unexplained Delay.

The Bombay High Court allowed two criminal writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders passed under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Police Officer in SC/ST Act Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Court Held That Acts Alleged Were in Discharge of Official Duty, Making Sanction Mandatory Before Investigation.

The State of Maharashtra filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging an order passed by the Judicial Magistra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Revision Case — Assessing Officer's Order Not Erroneous Under Section 263. Commissioner Cannot Substitute View Where Assessing Officer Applied Mind and Took Plausible View on Depreciation of Current Investments by Bank.

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 15 January 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Disabled Employee Against Private Company for Violation of Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. Employer Directed to Re-Employ or Pay Compensation for Hearing Loss Acquired Due to Unsafe Work Environment.

The petitioner, Shree Satish Prabhakar Padhye, a person with hearing disability, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...