Search Results for "employer liability"

945 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 945 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Remands for Fresh Determination on Disability and Wages. Commissioner's order set aside for failure to consider relevant evidence and apply correct legal principles under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The appeal was filed by the Shipping Corporation of India Limited, the employer, under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Award Denying Subsistence Allowance for Failure to Mark Attendance During Suspension. Suspended Employee Not Required to Attend Factory Daily for Subsistence Allowance Under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.

The petitioner, M/s. Hindustan Level Employees Union, challenged an Award dated 13.08.2014 which rejected a Reference concerning denial of subsistence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging ESI Coverage for Sweet Shop Based on Disputed Employee Count. Court holds that ESI Corporation must determine coverage under Section 2(12) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 after proper inquiry and opportunity of hearing.

The petitioner, M/s Anil Chat Bhandar, a proprietary concern engaged in preparing and selling sweets and snacks in Nagpur, challenged orders passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Reinstatement of Bank Employee in Disciplinary Matter — Full Back Wages Awarded for Flawed Inquiry. Syndicate Bank's Dismissal of Clerk for Alleged Misconduct Set Aside as Inquiry Was Vitiated by Bias and Non-Supply of Documents.

The petitioner, Syndicate Bank, a nationalised bank, challenged the Part-I Award dated 28.5.2003 and Part-II Award dated 7.9.2010 passed by the Centra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer Not Liable for Wages During Lockout Period Due to Binding Settlement. Settlement Between Union and Employer Under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act Precludes Claim for Wages for Period of No Work.

The appellant, M/s. Mehta Gem Tools Private Limited, challenged an order of the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No. 255...