Search Results for "distributor"

206 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 206 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Charge-Sheet in Insecticide Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Invalid Complaint. The court held that the complaint was not filed by a duly authorized Insecticide Inspector and no valid sanction was obtained under Section 31 of the Insecticide Act, 1968.

The applicant, Tajraj s/o Yadorav Chavhan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of FIR No. 0244/2023...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Step-father for Murder of Step-son Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC sustained as prosecution established motive, last seen, recovery of incriminating articles, and medical evidence.

The appellant, Sikandar alias Raju Vajir Inamdar, was convicted by the II Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of his step-son Jayku...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case — Royalty on Bad Debts Not Deductible Without Actual Sales. ITAT erred in deleting disallowance of royalty paid on bad debts where software did not work, as no sale occurred.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order of the Income Tax Appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Chemist's Licence for Substandard Drugs — Petitioner Furnished Manufacturer Details and Discontinued Sale, No Lack of Diligence Established Under Section 34 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

The petitioner, Kedarnath Saraf, was a licensed chemist and druggist under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Unauthorized Distribution of Marathi Dramatical Work. Copyright in cinematograph film of dramatic work vests in producer, and unauthorized sale of video copies constitutes infringement under Copyright Act, 1957.

The plaintiffs, Mr. Dilip Jadhav (plaintiff no.1) and Marathi Natyavyavasayik Nirmata Sangh (plaintiff no.2), filed a suit seeking to restrain the def...