Search Results for "disapproval"

240 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 240 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Vacate Interim Injunction in Development Agreement Dispute. Plaintiff's Readiness and Willingness Not Shown to Be Lacking Due to Defendant's Own Conduct Under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC.

The Bombay High Court dismissed an application filed by defendant No.1A (Vivek Madhavlal Pittie) seeking vacation of an interim injunction granted on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment Project Despite Narrow Road Width, Applies Promissory Estoppel Against Municipal Corporation. MCGM Estopped from Refusing Permission After Granting Initial Approval and Petitioner Acting to His Detriment.

The petitioner, Gufran Suleman Qureshi, proprietor of M/s Sirsiwala Realty, sought redevelopment of a building in Mumbai. The Municipal Corporation of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in MOFA Dispute — Petitioner's Rights as Agreement Holder Ignored. Unilateral Conveyance Granted Without Notice to Petitioner Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

The Petitioner, Gayatri Construction, a partnership firm, challenged an order dated 15 November 2022 and corrigendum dated 20 December 2022 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking LL.B. Course Duration Reduction and Fee Refund. Court holds that academic policy decisions are within the domain of expert bodies and not subject to judicial review under Article 226.

The petitioners, Forum For Fast Justice and its founder chairman, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging MCZMA's Refusal of CRZ Clearance for Occupancy Certificate. MCZMA cannot refuse clearance on ground of mismatch between DCR 1991 and DCR 1967 when construction was lawfully permitted under DCR 1991.

The petitioner, MRK Enterprises, a partnership firm, owned a property known as 'Amir House' at Colaba, Mumbai. The petitioner sought a Coastal Zone Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction in Cessed Building Area — No Violation of DCR Found. Petitioner failed to establish that the construction violated Development Control Regulations or that the building was a cessed building under MHADA.

The petitioner, Asif Abdul Sattar, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a building by Respo...