Search Results for "dilapidated building"

186 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 186 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Rent Enhancement Dispute Under Article 227. High Court Exceeded Supervisory Jurisdiction by Ordering Enhancement Without Remand.

The case involves a dispute between the State of Uttar Pradesh (appellant-tenant) and Raghvendra Nath Srivastava & Ors. (respondent-landlords) regardi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Injunction in Municipal Notice Challenge. Notice under Section 354 of MMC Act for demolition of dilapidated building held valid despite alleged lack of service to occupier, as reconstruction of already demolished room cannot be ordered.

The appellants, Sumitra Shashikant Khokhani, Vishesh Shashikant Khokhani, and Sanjay Shashikant Khokhani, were occupants of room No. D-4 admeasuring 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds MHADA's Order for Repairs and Redevelopment of Cessed Building Under Section 95A of MHADA Act. Court Directs Tenants to Pay Increased Rent and Vacate for Redevelopment, Rejecting Challenge to Executive Engineer's Order.

The appellants, eight tenants of a cessed building in Chittaranjan Nagar, Ghatkopar, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 24 April...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 364, and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Varsha Bhimrao Rasal, was convicted by the 1st Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Karad, in Sessions Case No.8 of 2004 for the offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Occupants Challenging Redevelopment Scheme Under DCR 33(7) — Majority Consent and Sanctioned Plans Upheld. Court held that the redevelopment scheme was validly sanctioned and the petitioners' objections were not sufficient to stall the project.

The petitioners, seventeen occupants of residential tenements in Dalal Estate, Mumbai Central, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...