Search Results for "differential pay"

380 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 380 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition for First Higher Pay Scale Based on Departmental Examination Rules, Quashes Government Denials and Grants Limited Arrears

The petitioner, a retired Gujarati Typist, filed a writ petition under Articles 14, 16, and 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the first higher ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Part Regarding Penalty Calculation for Unauthorized Admissions in Technical Education. Penalty must be based on actual fees collected, not sanctioned fees, under Government Resolution dated 22.01.2007.

The petitioners, Sinhgad Technical Education Society and Sau Venutai Chavan Polytechnic, Pune, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Selection of Reader in Ayurvedic College — Selection Process Not Vitiated by Alleged Bias or Procedural Irregularities. Petitioner Failed to Prove Bias or Mala Fides in Selection Under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

The petitioner, Dr. Rajeshkumar Prakashchandra Gupta, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bayer's Challenge to Compulsory License for Nexavar Under Section 84 of Patents Act, 1970. Court Holds That Patentee's Import of Drug at High Price Does Not Satisfy Reasonable Requirements of Public or Constitute Working of Invention in India.

The petitioner, Bayer Corporation, a US-based pharmaceutical company, held a patent for the drug Sorafenib Tosylate, sold under the brand name Nexavar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Antidumping Duty Gap Period Case. Tribunal's Decision That No Antidumping Duty Can Be Levied During Period Between Expiry of Provisional Duty and Imposition of Final Duty Under Rule 21 of Customs Tariff (Antidumping) Rules, 1995 Upheld.

The Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai, filed appeals against orders of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated 1 Aug...