Search Results for "developed land allotment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "developed land allotment"

342 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 342 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Land Owner's Right to Insist on Acquisition under Section 126 MRTP Act After Town Planning Scheme Reservation. The Court frames the legal issue regarding the interrelationship between Chapters V and VII of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 in the context of land reserved for public purposes.

1 Aug 2026

The appeal arose from a dispute regarding a plot of land reserved for Municipal Office in a Town Planning Scheme under the Maharashtra Regional and To...

Supreme Court

Public Interest Prevails Over Private Rights: : BIADA vs M/s Scope Sales Pvt Ltd (2026 INSC 89)

23 Jan 2026

The case arose when the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (BIADA) allotted land to M/s Scope Sales Pvt. Ltd. for commercial use. Subsequentl...

High Court

Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Challenge Land Acquisition After Preliminary Notification – Karnataka High Court | Arkavathi Layout Case

20 Jan 2026

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order/report dated 23.02.2023 passed by t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Project — Petitioners Failed to Demonstrate Violation of Statutory Provisions or Fundamental Rights. The court held that the acquisition was for a public purpose and that the petitioners' remedy lay in seeking enhancement of compensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, rather than challenging the acquisition itself.

7 Jul 2023

The petitioners, owners of land in Village Wagholi, Pune, challenged the acquisition of their land for a road widening project by the State of Maharas...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Upholding Ancestry-Based Classification. The Court Affirms That Distinction Between 'Pushtaini' and 'Gair-Pushtaini' Landholders for Compensation Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Related Rules Has a Reasonable Nexus with Rehabilitation Objectives.

20 Feb 2023

The appeals arose from a judgment and order dated 30 March 2018 by a Full Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, which upheld a classific...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.

10 May 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Decides Regular First Appeal Arising from Dismissal of Suit for Declaration of Property Ownership. Property Originally Allotted to a Swamiji Under Mysore Government Scheme and Later Subject to Litigation Over Inheritance and Alleged Fraud.

28 Mar 2014

The appeal arose from the dismissal of a suit for declaration of ownership of immovable property situated in Bangalore. The original plaintiff, C.R. H...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order Under Section 33 of Displaced Persons Compensation and Rehabilitation Act, 1954 — Evacuee Property Claim Rejected Due to Lack of Evidence of Ownership and Possession. The court held that the burden of proof lies on the claimant to establish ownership and possession of property notified as evacuee property under Section 7 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1947.

11 May 2012

The petitioners, Shaikh Mohammad Murghay and Smt. Sheela Ravindra Lakhanpal, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Development Rights Certificate for Recreation Ground Amenity Under Regulation 34 of DCR 1991. Owner entitled to TDR for construction upon developing and handing over reserved amenity free of cost.

8 Aug 2011

The petitioners, Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a wri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Hawking Activities on Footpaths in Nariman Point and Churchgate Areas. Court Holds That Hawking Is a Fundamental Right Under Article 19(1)(g) Subject to Reasonable Restrictions, and That Municipal Authorities Have Discretion to Designate Hawking Zones.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, a group of residents and welfare associations from Nariman Point and Churchgate areas in Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)