Search Results for "destroying evidence"

193 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 193 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The court held that sanction under Section 19 is mandatory and its absence vitiates the prosecution, entitling the accused to discharge.

The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by two applicants, Kisan Baliram Rathod and Vibhuti Radharaman Devnath, challenging an orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The present appeal was filed by original accused No.1, Rafiq Beg Mirza, challenging his conviction by the learned Special Judge, Jalgaon, in Special C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Father-in-Law for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault on Minor Daughter-in-Law. Victim's Credible Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 376, 506(II) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Tukaram Pandurang Mhaske, was convicted by the Designated Judge under the POCSO Act for offences under Sections 376 and 506(II) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Outraging Modesty Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 354 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The petitioner, Mohana @ Mohi @ Thimmaiah, was convicted by the Trial Court (C.J. (Sr. Dn.,) and JMFC, Gubbi) in C.C.No.188/2007 for the offence under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application and Discharges Accused in Murder Case Due to Absence of Prima Facie Evidence. Mere Presence in Joint Family Not Sufficient to Attract Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC for Murder Charges.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by two applicants, Sau. Ashadevi W/o Jaiprakash Sawal and Sau. Mangala W/o Omprakash Sawal, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Sandeep son of Kaniram Rathod, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the offence of rape under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Accused's Appeal Dismissed as Evidence of Last Seen and Recovery of Weapon Proved Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Dilip Kisan Savant, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 498/93 for the murder of Muralilal Jivram...