Search Results for "dependency deduction"

475 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 475 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal of Claimants in Motor Accident Case — Negligence of Scooter Driver Cannot Be Attributed to Pillion Rider. Compensation Enhanced from Rs.2,51,325 to Rs.9,26,800 for Death of 28-Year-Old Mason in Bus Collision Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Bhikhaji Thakor, was a pillion rider on a scooter that was hit by a Gujarat State Road...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Incorrect Income Assessment and Deduction Ratio. Deceased's income reassessed at Rs.7000 per month with 50% future prospects and 1/3 deduction, enhancing compensation from Rs.5,30,600 to Rs.9,52,000.

The appeal arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased Thakor Khengarji died in a vehicular accident on 23.02.2017 while riding as a pillion...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Incorrect Deduction of Personal Expenses and Omission of Future Prospects. Compensation Enhanced from Rs. 7,50,000 to Rs. 6,52,000 for Death of Self-Employed Married Man with Six Dependents Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 arises from a judgment and award dated 03.09.2025 passed by the Motor Accident Cl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Case, Restores Tribunal's Compensation with Enhancements. Split Multiplier Method Rejected; Future Prospects and Standardised Consortium Granted as per Pranay Sethi.

The appeal arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Laxman Das Mahour, aged 57-58 years, died on 07.03.2014 after being hit by a bus. He...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Negligence Apportionment Set Aside and Compensation Enhanced. Deceased's income assessed at Rs. 15,000 per month with 25% future prospects and multiplier of 14 applied under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellants, original claimants in a motor accident claim petition, filed an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Sets Aside Contributory Negligence Finding. Deceased motorcyclist hit by tempo from behind; court holds tempo driver solely negligent, enhances compensation to Rs.2,58,44,336/- with 9% interest.

The appellants, legal representatives of the deceased Anil Yadav, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation of Rs.33,15,500/- to Parents of Deceased Army Soldier. Negligence of Autorickshaw Driver Established; No Contributory Negligence by Deceased.

The case arises from a fatal motor accident that occurred on Belgaum-Khanapur road near Desur cross. The deceased, Sham Mahadev Yallurkar, aged 23, wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Enhanced from Rs. 1,08,000 to Rs. 2,31,000. Multiplier of 16 applied for deceased aged 22 years, with 50% deduction for personal expenses and 50% addition for future prospects under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 5th May 1994 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Nashik, partly rejecting the claim for c...