Search Results for "deceptive similarity"

124 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Opposition Case — Registration of Device Mark Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Use. The Court held that the Registrar erred in accepting user claim without proper documentary evidence, and that the appellant's prior use since 1992 was established.

The appellant, Ganesh Consumer Products Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, against an order dated 11.09.2024 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'HOTEL SPECIAL' vs 'SVT HOTEL SPECIAL' for Asafoetida. Deceptive Similarity Established Despite Addition of Prefix 'SVT'.

The appellant/defendant, S.V.T Products, challenged an interim injunction order passed by the XVIII Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, in O.S. No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'SUKOON OIL' Label — Appellant's Use of 'SUKOON' Label Held Deceptively Similar to Respondent's Registered Trademark.

The respondent-plaintiff, Shafeeque Ahmed Mohammed Sayeed, trading as M/s. Nageena Ayurvedic Pharmacy, filed a suit for infringement of registered tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Passing Off and Trade Mark Infringement of 'CARTER'S BLUE' Mark. Defendants' Use of Deceptively Similar Names Despite Conducting Agreement and Registration Constitutes Passing Off.

The plaintiff, Mehboob Khan, sole proprietor of 'Carter's Blue' restaurant, filed a suit for trade mark infringement and passing off against the defen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — 'LIVE IN' Mark Found Deceptively Similar to 'LIVE-IN'. Phonetic and visual similarity between marks leads to injunction under Section 29(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Federal Brands Ltd., filed a trademark infringement and passing off suit against Levi Strauss India Pvt. Ltd. seeking a temporary injun...