Search Results for "conditional withdrawal"

144 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 144 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Contractual Forfeiture Case — HUDCO Cannot Forfeit Payments Without Fulfilling Reciprocal Obligations. Allotment Cancellation and Forfeiture of Rs. 28.11 Crores Set Aside as Unjust Enrichment Where Lessor Failed to Execute Agreement to Sub-Lease.

The dispute arose from an allotment letter issued by HUDCO to Tomorrowland Limited for a 99-year lease of land to build a 5-star hotel. The appellant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tilaknagar's Injunction Claim in Trademark Passing Off Dispute Over MANSION HOUSE and SAVOY CLUB. Court Holds That 1987 Agreements Ceding Trademarks Were Conditional and Revocable, and Tilaknagar Failed to Establish Exclusive Ownership.

The judgment arises from a commercial IPR suit involving a counterclaim by Tilaknagar Industries Ltd. (Tilaknagar) against Herman Jansen Beverages Ned...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Release of Sealed Factory Premises in Customs Duty Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Comply with Supreme Court's Conditional Order. Interest Demand Under Section 28AA of Customs Act, 1962 is Statutory and Automatic, No Separate Demand Required.

The petitioner, B.V. Jewels, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting gold and jewellery, operates an export processing unit in SEEPZ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Levy of Entry Tax on Natural Gas Under Maharashtra Entry Tax Act, 2002 — Holds That Natural Gas Is Not 'Goods' for Entry Tax Purposes When Supplied Through Pipelines

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by companies (Deepak Fertilisers and Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd., Smartchem Technologies Ltd., Emp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Price of Goods Allegedly Defective. The Court held that the defendant's claim of defective goods raised a triable issue, entitling it to unconditional leave to defend under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The Petitioner, Minda Vast Access System Private Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Injunction Bank Guarantee Encashment in Commercial Dispute. No Case of Fraud or Irretrievable Injustice Made Out to Restrain Bank Guarantee Invocation Under Contract Law Principles.

The appeal arises from an order of the learned Single Judge refusing to grant an injunction restraining the respondent from encashing a bank guarantee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Transfer of Designated Officers Under Food Safety Act — Administrative Transfer Not a Punishment Without Stigma. Transfer Order Issued in Public Interest and Administrative Convenience Does Not Require Prior Hearing Under Article 311(2) of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, eleven Designated Officers under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, challenged their transfer orders dated 15.12.2014 before th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Employees Against Air India for Failure to Accept Resignations. Employer Cannot Refuse Resignation or Force Employee to Continue Service Under Air India Certified Standing Orders.

The petitioners were employees of Air India Limited (respondent no.2) whose services were transferred to Air India Engineering Services Limited (respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment for Recovery of Security Deposit in Leave and Licence Agreement Dispute. Option to Purchase Not Exercised Does Not Convert Licence into Sale.

The plaintiff, Polaroid India P.Ltd, filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for recovery of Rs.1,60,00,000/- being ...