Search Results for "collusive transfer"

110 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 110 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Execution Objection Case — Upholds Summary Rejection of Objection Petition Under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC. Executing Court Not Required to Adjudicate Title When Objection is Frivolous and Collusive.

The appellant, Kamal W/o Vishwanath Jadhav, filed a second appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 11.09.2025 passed by the first appellate C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tahsildar's Endorsement Rejecting Mutation Entry for Land Granted Under Section 94 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. Revenue Authorities Cannot Adjudicate Title or Validity of Grant in Mutation Proceedings; Mutation Entries Are Only for Fiscal Purposes.

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"High Court Decrees Specific Performance; Doctrine of Lis Pendens Applied to Override Subsequent Sale" "Litigation pendente lite affects all subsequent alienations, regardless of notice to the purchaser."

The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court’s decision that allowed the specific performance of a sale agreement. The High Court applied the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal: Stranger to Compromise Decree Can Challenge It by Separate Suit — Order 23 Rule 3A CPC Does Not Bar Such Suit

The appeal arose from a suit filed by the appellant, Triloki Nath Singh, seeking a declaration that a compromise decree dated 15 September 1994 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Owners' Challenge to 1953 Acquisition for Mumbai Airport Due to Inordinate Delay. Petition filed after 62 years challenging acquisition under Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 dismissed as grossly belated.

The petitioners, original land owners of properties in Villages Marol and Sahar, Taluka Andheri, Mumbai, filed a writ petition in 2015 seeking quashin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Shareholders in Patent Ownership Suit — Applicants Holding 6.3% Shares Have Sufficient Interest in Subject Matter of Suit. Shareholders are proper parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC when the suit concerns company assets that affect share value.

The applicants, Percy Rutton Kavasmaneck and Aban Percy Kavasmaneck, filed a Chamber Summons seeking impleadment as party defendants in Suit No. 2932 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Regularisation of Encroachment on Communidade Land in Public Interest Litigation. Administrative Tribunal's Order Regularising Unauthorised Construction by Minister Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Communidade Land Protection Laws.

The petitioner, an advocate and public spirited citizen, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the order of the Administrative Tribunal (resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Larger Bench Holds Shareholder/Promoter is an 'Aggrieved Person' Under Section 61 IBC and Has Locus to Challenge Section 7 Admission Order. The reference resolves conflicting views on maintainability of appeal by shareholder against admission of insolvency petition.

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) Chennai Bench, in a larger bench of three members, addressed a reference question: whether a share...