Search Results for "co-accused witness"

143 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 143 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42(2) and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c), and 29 of NDPS Act set aside as mandatory procedural safeguards were violated.

The appellant, Salim Jamshed Ali Shaikh @ Kanya, was convicted by the Special Judge (NDPS Act), Mumbai, in Special Case No.78 of 2010 for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rajratan Sahebrao Nawghare, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nanded, in Special Case (POCSO) No.10/2013 for offences under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Court holds that motive, last seen evidence, and recovery of weapons at instance of accused establish guilt under Section 302 read with 34 IPC.

The appellants, Jivya Dharma Chothe and Lakshi Arjun Mirka, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar, for the murder of Mahadu and cau...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Section 411 IPC Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge of Stolen Property. Conviction for Dishonest Receipt of Stolen Property Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Mens Rea Under Section 411 IPC.

The applicant, Rajesh Ganeshmal Oswal, was accused no.4 in Regular Criminal Case No.110 of 2008 before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Railway C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Ramkishan @ Pintya s/o Asaram Kayande and Ramprasad @ Nana Dattatraya Janjal, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-2, Jalna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 145 CrPC Proceedings in Multi-Party Disputes and Successive Orders. The court held that Section 145 CrPC applies to disputes involving more than two parties and that successive orders are permissible if fresh material shows a new apprehension of breach of peace.

The case involves a group of writ petitions and intervention applications challenging the validity of proceedings under Section 145 of the Code of Cri...