Search Results for "cleaner injury"

114 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 114 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last seen theory and recovery of stolen articles establish guilt under Sections 302, 392, 452 IPC.

The appellant, Nareshkumar Rajpal Bagdi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane for the murder of Shrimati Shraddha Pardeshi and for ro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Legal Heirs in Workmen's Compensation Case: Death of Truck Driver While Fetching Water from Canal Held to Arise Out of Employment. Notional Extension Doctrine Applied to Compensate Under Employee's Compensation Act, 1923.

The appellants, legal heirs of the deceased truck driver, were granted compensation by the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner under the Workmen's Com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimant's Appeal in Motor Accident Case — Negligence of Tractor Driver Proved, Compensation Enhanced for Loss of Future Earnings Due to Permanent Disability.

The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimant, Babanna H. @ Babu, a loader, was injured on 20.03.2013 when the tract...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimant's Appeal in Motor Accident Case — Negligence of Tractor Driver Proved, Compensation Enhanced for Loss of Future Earnings Due to Permanent Disability.

The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimant, Babanna H. @ Babu, a loader, was traveling on a tractor-trailer loade...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Appellate Court Cannot Routinely Enhance Compensation Without Claimant's Appeal or Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Claims. Enhancement Permissible Only in Manifestly Unjust Awards Under Section 168 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a First Appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, filed by United India Insurance Co Ltd against an award of the Motor Accident ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Interim Compensation Under Section 140 MV Act Cannot Be Kept in Abeyance. Tribunal erred in deferring no-fault liability compensation pending final adjudication of main claim petition.

The appellant, K.L. Vidyashankar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation for injuries sustained...