Search Results for "cheque number"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "cheque number"

615 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 615 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness's testimony was not corroborated and recovery of tainted money was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

22 Jan 2024

The appellant, Ramesh Tukaram Waghmare, was a District Social Welfare Officer at Zilla Parishad, Wardha, and was the sanctioning authority for grant-i...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt. Complainant failed to establish legally enforceable debt or liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as the cheque was given as security for a business transaction.

2 Mar 2020

The case involves an appeal by the complainant, Shankar Jaganath Mane, against the acquittal of the accused, Sikkandar Mohammed Bidiwala, for an offen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal and Convicts Accused for Cheque Dishonour. Presumption under Section 139 of N.I. Act stands unless rebutted by accused on preponderance of probabilities.

11 Oct 2019

The appellant, Ashok Kumar, filed a complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. before the XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, against t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Role in Company Affairs. Petitioner was not in charge of or responsible for conduct of business of the company at the time of offence, essential for vicarious liability under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

17 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Mrs. Lata Pramod Dave, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Article 227 of the...

High Court

High Court Quashes Process Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Specific Allegations of Vicarious Liability. Director Not Involved in Day-to-Day Affairs of Company Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 r/w 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Averments of Role and Responsibility.

14 Aug 2015

The applicant, Gaurav Vijay Bhatia, was accused No. 3 in a criminal complaint filed by Ramnath P. Subramaniam (respondent No. 1) under Section 138 rea...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Failure to Prove Debt. Complainant failed to establish legally enforceable debt or liability under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as loan transaction was not proved.

2 Jul 2015

The appellant, Meera S. Chiplunkar, was the original complainant in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against the resp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 operates in favour of complainant once issuance and signature are admitted, shifting burden on accused to rebut.

28 Apr 2015

The appellant, Pandurang Ramchandra Ghorpade, filed two criminal appeals against the acquittal of respondent No.1, Vijay Gopala Lohar, in two separate...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court held that once issuance and signature are admitted, the presumption of legally enforceable debt arises, and the accused must rebut it.

13 Apr 2010

The appellant, the original complainant, filed an appeal against the acquittal of the accused in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Section 138 NI Act Case, Holding Unsigned Complaint is Curable Irregularity. Amendment to Sign Complaint Relates Back to Date of Filing, Saving Limitation.

18 Mar 2010

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from complaints filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, by M/s. Reliance Indus...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act for Cheque Dishonour Due to Stop Payment. Accused's Defence of Agreement Breach Fails as Stop Payment Constitutes Dishonour Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

27 Sep 2006

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Gabriel Peter D'Souza, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negoti...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)