Search Results for "borrowed funds"

390 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 390 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies when signature on cheque is admitted, shifting burden on accused to rebut existence of debt.

The appellant, Bapurao s/o Motiram Mankar, a senior citizen, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Reverses Acquittal Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless rebutted by accused with probable defence.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by the original complainant, Sandeep Shirodkar, against the acquittal of the accused, Shankar Dhawaskar, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Deemed Dividend Case Under Section 2(22)(e) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Non-Consideration of Provisions and Admission of Borrowing.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 set aside as complainant failed to establish that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt or liability.

The revision petition was filed by Sri. Shanmugam (petitioner) against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 03.12.2022 passed in C.C.No.259/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant to File Complaints at Mangalore Under Section 138 NI Act. Territorial Jurisdiction Under Section 142(2)(a) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Vests in Court Where Payee Maintains Bank Account, Not Where Cheque Deposited for Collection.

The appeals arose from the Supreme Court of India, Sanjay Kumar and Satish Chandra Sharma JJ., involving criminal complaints under Section 138 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Presumption Under Section 139 Rebutted by Accused Showing Loan Not Advanced.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Jagadish R, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act Upheld. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Sections 118 and 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The present criminal revision petition was filed by the accused-petitioner, Sri R. Rajappa, challenging the judgment of conviction and order on senten...