Search Results for "bogus agreement"

319 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 319 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Agreement for Sale of Open Amenity Space by Municipal Corporation to Private Developer. Municipal Corporation Cannot Alienate Public Amenity Space Reserved Under Development Plan Without Following Statutory Procedure Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Prashant Bhagwantrao Palande, a resident of Mira Road, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Involving Tribal Land Transfer. Decree for specific performance of agreement to sell tribal land to non-tribal can be granted subject to obtaining permission under Section 36A of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

The appellant, Babasaheb Dhondiba Kute, a non-tribal, entered into an agreement dated 31.07.2001 with the respondent, Radhu Vithoba Barde, a tribal, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Suit for Alleged Will of 1975 Due to Non-Prosecution and Failure to Prove Execution. The court held that the propounder must prove due execution and attestation under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and failure to lead evidence results in dismissal.

The suit was filed by the plaintiffs, who were great grandsons and other relatives of the deceased, seeking probate of an alleged Will dated 3rd Janua...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.

The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Television Serial Production Dispute. Arbitrator's Findings on Breach of Contract and Quantum of Damages Upheld Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Workmen Seeking Absorption in Western Coalfields Limited — Canteen Workers Not Entitled to Direct Absorption as Contractor Was Not a Sham and Contract Labour Was Not Prohibited Under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1947.

The petitioner, a trade union representing workmen of Taroda Opencast Mine of Western Coalfields Limited, challenged an award of the Central Governmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Forged Power of Attorney and Tenancy Documents. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove forgery of a registered General Power of Attorney and tenancy letter, reversing the trial court's decree for possession.

The case involves a property dispute over Flat No.6 in a building called SUNBEAM. The plaintiff, Rufina M. Pinto, claimed ownership of the entire buil...