FERA APPEAL NO. 57 OF 2006
26 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "appeal without stay"
4572 result(s) found
Found 4572 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Suit on Limitation Grounds, Setting Aside Plaint Rejection. Suit for Declaration of Sale Deed as Void Not Barred by Limitation as Fraud Allegations Under Section 17 of Limitation Act, 1963 Require Factual Inquiry, Making Preliminary Issue Determination Improper Under Order VII Rule 11(d) and Order XIV Rule 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
28 Mar 2022The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by the plaintiff seeking multiple declarations regarding property rights. The plaintiff claimed that a ...
- 917
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Direction for Payment of Rent During Pendency of Eviction Appeals Under Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961. The court interpreted Section 13 to allow appellate courts to impose conditions like payment of reasonable rent as a term for stay of eviction, especially when eviction is decreed on grounds other than rent default.
22 Feb 2022The appeals involved common questions regarding the interpretation of Section 13 of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961, in the context...
- 425
High Court
Bombay High Court Pronounces Judgment in Criminal Appeal Against MPID Court's Order Rejecting Application to Declare Attachment Void. Appeal Raises Questions on Compliance with Sections 4 and 5 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interests of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999.
19 Jan 2016The criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from an order of the designated court under the Maharashtra Protection of Interests of Deposito...
- 288
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Commercial Summary Suit Cases — Triable Issues Raised on Guarantee and Limitation. Court holds that existence of disputed facts regarding limitation and discharge of guarantor requires unconditional leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC.
22 Sep 2022The judgment arises from two commercial appeals filed by the defendants against the dismissal of their applications for leave to defend in commercial ...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Rejecting Condonation of Delay in Customs and Central Excise Appeals; Directs Fresh Consideration. Appellate Authorities Failed to Exclude Time Taken in Prosecuting Writ Petitions Before Filing Statutory Appeals, as Required Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.
24 Dec 2014The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. The lead petition, WP N...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes ITAT's Interim Refund Order in Pending Appeal — Tribunal Cannot Direct Refund Without Adjudicating Merits Under Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to grant interim relief without hearing the main appeal, as it would render the appeal infructuous and cause prejudice to the revenue.
4 Feb 2014The Director of Income Tax (Exemption), Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25 November 2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate T...
- 136
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeal Under Section 14 of Admiralty Act Against Single Judge Order Dismissing Defendant's Notice of Motion. The dispute concerned breach of a bareboat charterparty and a subsequent time charterparty regarding a vessel.
23 Jul 2019The original plaintiff, Siem Offshore Rederi AS, a Norwegian company, filed Admiralty Suit (L) No. 20 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court against the...
- 13
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Expunges Adverse Remarks Against Commissioner State Excise in Liquor Licence Dispute. High Court's Directions to Act Properly and Anticipatory Stay Held Unwarranted.
7 Jan 2019The Supreme Court dealt with two sets of appeals arising from a Bombay High Court judgment concerning liquor licence holders in Mumbai suburbs. The ap...
- 213
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Rejection of Application to Declare Attachment Void Under MPID Act. Appellant Challenged Attachment Order on Grounds of Non-Compliance with Sections 4 and 5 of Maharashtra Protection of Interests of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999, and Absence of Competent Authority.
19 Jan 2016The appeal before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from an order dated 30 July 2015 passed by the Special Judge under the Maharashtra...
- 357
