Search Results for "allowable deduction"

143 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 143 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on Unjust Enrichment. Bar of Unjust Enrichment Not Applicable to Provisional Assessment Cases Prior to Amendment of Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-III Commissionerate, against the judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Revenue in Block of Assets Case — Industrial Gala Sale Taxed as Short Term Capital Gain Under Section 50. Non-Use of Asset Does Not Remove It from Block of Assets; Depreciation History Determines Tax Treatment.

The case involves an income tax reference by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, at the instance of the assessee, Smt. Meena v. Pamnani, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules Share Issue Expenses to Dilute Foreign Equity as Capital Expenditure Under Income Tax Act, 1961. Interest on Share Application Money Cannot Be Adjusted Against Such Capital Expenditure.

The case involves an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) at the ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Disallowance of Interest Case. Tribunal's finding that assessee had sufficient interest-free funds for investments upheld, and S.A. Builders precedent on business purpose for advances to sister concerns applied.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Payment to Retiring Partners Held Capital Expenditure. Amount of Rs.1,34,678 paid to retiring partners under Memorandum of Understanding is capital expenditure not deductible as revenue expenditure.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The assessee, Mandovi Hotel Pvt....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Revenue in Income Tax Reference on HUF Income Assessment. Income from assets received on partition by a bachelor remains individual income even after marriage, as no HUF is created without blending.

The case involves a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal at the instance of the assessee, ...