High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Involving Tax Authorities and Investigation Agencies. The Court Found No Ground for Intervention in the Petition Challenging Actions of Income Tax and Sales Tax Authorities.
24 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "additional information"
7705 result(s) found
Found 7705 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reassessment Notice Under Income Tax Act — Notice Issued Beyond Time Limit and Without Proper Sanction Is Invalid. Reassessment notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 quashed as time-barred and sanction under Section 151 not by competent authority.
28 Mar 2024The petitioner, a foreign company, challenged a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2016-...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Junior Auditor Recruitment Case — Petitioner's B.Com Degree with 55% Marks Satisfies Eligibility Condition. Cut-off Date for Qualification is Date of Application, Not Date of Advertisement.
2 Apr 2024The petitioner, Sharad Devidas Shelke, filed a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Mahar...
- 45
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Government Engineer in Lokayukta Case — Source Information Report Lacks Credible Material. Court holds that mere source information without verification cannot justify registration of crime under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
28 Jul 2023The petitioner, an Assistant Executive Engineer in the Public Works Department and currently functioning as Assistant Director of Town Planning, Yelah...
- 165
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in MSETCL — Probation Period Extended Validly Under Service Rules. Termination of Probationer Without Stigma Upheld as Employer's Discretion Under Regulation 11 of MSETCL Service Regulations.
24 Oct 2016The petitioners, Chandrashekhar Tukarampant Madankar, Anup Udhav Lokhande, and Harshal Radheshyam Malewar, were appointed as Junior Engineers (Electri...
- 131
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Trafficking Victims, Issues Guidelines for Rescue and Rehabilitation. Court Holds That State Must Take Reasonable Measures to Safeguard Right to Rehabilitation Under Article 21.
1 Jan 1970This Miscellaneous Application arose from a prior disposed Public Interest Litigation regarding human trafficking. The petitioner sought enforcement o...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Income Tax Search and Seizure Action Under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Court Holds That Formation of Reason to Believe by the Authorizing Officer Is Based on Material on Record and Not Open to Challenge Unless Malafide or No Material Exists.
10 May 2024The petitioners, a private limited company and its directors and their relatives, challenged the search and seizure action conducted on 9th and 10th J...
- 566
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction Overturned as Prosecution Failed to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances and Comply with Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 in Recovery of Deceased's Body.
12 Jan 2023The appeal arose from a murder case where the appellant, Boby (accused No. 3), was convicted by the trial court and High Court for offences including ...
- 344
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in a Case of Assault and Concealment of Dead Body. The court held that the chain of circumstantial evidence, including disclosure statements and recovery of the dead body, was complete and sufficient to prove the guilt of the appellants under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
24 Jan 2011The appellants, Hanuman and Bhagwan, sons of Tulshiram Jadhav, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gangakhed, in Sessions Case No.10/2008...
- 76
High Court
Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.
10 Nov 2016The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...
- 54
