Search Results for "additional fee"

1900 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1900 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Somanahalli Toll Plaza Case: Karnataka High Court Protects Local Residents from Daily Toll Charges.

The Karnataka High Court partly allowed a writ petition filed by residents of Somanahalli, Nelaguli and Kaggalipura villages challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes One-Time Spectrum Charge on Cellular Operators for Spectrum Beyond 6.2 MHz, Holding No Statutory Power Under Telegraph Act, 1885 to Impose Retrospective Charges

The case involved a writ petition filed by major cellular mobile service operators, Bharti Airtel Limited and Vodafone Idea Limited, challenging the i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Licensee's Challenge to Arrears Demand and License Lapse in Bombay Prohibition Act Case. Demand for License Fee Arrears for Period Prior to License Grant Held Unenforceable and License Cannot Lapse Without Notice.

The petitioner, Suresh Krishnaji Lakudkar, held a CLIII license under the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, for the sale of foreign liquor. In Writ Petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act, 2006 as Constitutionally Valid. Levy of fire prevention fee under Section 12 is a fee, not a tax, and the Act is within legislative competence.

The petitioners, Vidarbha Taxpayers Association and a citizen, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of the Mahar...