Search Results for "Visitation rights"

106 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 106 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition for Custody of Minor Child from Maternal Grandparents. Father's Right to Custody of Eight-Year-Old Daughter Upheld as Natural Guardian Under Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, Section 6.

The petitioner, Sunil s/o Patiram Parteti, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of habeas corp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition for Custody of Minor Children from Father. Court holds that father's custody of children aged 3 years and 1.5 years is illegal and directs production and custody to mother, considering welfare of minor children as paramount.

The petitioner, Shubhangi w/o Ganesh Yadav, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Matrimonial Dispute Following Foreign Divorce Decree — Abuse of Process of Law. Consent of Informant and Foreign Divorce Decree Lead to Quashing of FIR Under Sections 498-A, 406, 506 IPC.

The applicants, Rahul Vishwas Mahajan, his parents Vishwas Ramdas Mahajan and Vaishali Vishwas Mahajan, filed an application under Section 482 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition by Father for Custody of Minor Child — Child in Mother's Custody Not Illegally Detained. Writ of Habeas Corpus Not Maintainable Where Custody Is with Natural Guardian and No Illegal Detention Is Shown.

The petitioner, Vayu Kishore, father of a 4-year-old minor child, Miss Vindhya Kishore, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Articles 226 and 227 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Tenants' Appeal in Rent Control Case — Striking Out Defence Not Automatic Under Section 15(7) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. Discretionary Power Must Be Exercised Judiciously; Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Justify Striking Out Defence.

The case involves an appeal by tenants against the High Court of Delhi's order upholding the Rent Controller's decision to strike out their defence in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal in Child Custody Case Due to Lack of Proper Service. Trial Court's Ex-Parte Order Handing Over Minor Daughter's Custody to Father Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice.

The appellant, Jayshri Gajendra Mahajan, wife of the respondent Gajendra Pandit Mahajan, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 16th Jun...