Search Results for "Vested Remainder"

103 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 103 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act Case — State Government's Appellate Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Reasoned Order Violates Section 39(3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959.

The Petitioner, Mangal Mahadu Korde, was elected as Sarpanch of Wakalwadi Village Panchayat in 2021. Respondent No.5, a member of the Panchayat, lodge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Against Refusal to Recall Witness in Partition Suit. Trial Court's Discretion to Reject Application Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC Upheld as Not Perverse.

The case arises from a civil revision petition filed by defendants 2 and 5 in a partition suit (O.S.No.53 of 2022) pending before the Additional Distr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. The court held that the appellants, as defendants, failed to prove exclusive title or ouster of co-owners, and the plaintiffs established their half share in the suit properties.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the plaintiffs (respondents) against the defendants (appellants and others) seeking half share in 'A' and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Government Order Dissolving Karnataka State Haj Committee — Violation of Natural Justice and Statutory Procedure Under Haj Committee Act, 2002. The court held that dissolution without hearing members is ultra vires and void.

The petitioners, comprising the Chairman and members of the Karnataka State Haj Committee, challenged the Government Order dated 20.01.2023 issued by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging DNA Test Order in POCSO Case — Accused Cannot Claim Right Against Self-Incrimination for DNA Evidence. DNA test is a scientific test and not testimonial compulsion, hence not violative of Article 20(3) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Devappa Halageri, was accused of raping a 16-year-old minor, resulting in her pregnancy and delivery of a girl child. The Koppal Rural...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging DNA Test Order in POCSO Case — Accused Cannot Claim Right Against Self-Incrimination for DNA Sampling in Rape Investigation. DNA test is a scientific test not amounting to testimonial compulsion under Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Devappa Halageri, was accused of raping a minor girl, resulting in her pregnancy and delivery of a child. The Koppal Rural Police regi...