Search Results for "Tahsildar enquiry"

765 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 765 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Combined PIL and Writ Petition on Unauthorized Construction and Allotment of Shops by Gram Panchayat; Authorities Direct Sealing and Cancellation of Allotments Citing Violation of Section 51(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act

The matter concerns a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) and a connected Writ Petition challenging the construction and allotment of shops by Gram Panch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010480352008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Land Revenue Case — Tahsildar's Order Under Section 140(2) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Restored. Single Judge Erred in Quashing Mutation Entry Without Considering Appellant's Right to Be Heard and Limitation for Challenge.

The appellant, Sunil Chajed, claimed to be the owner of land measuring 1 acre and 4.08 guntas bearing Sy.No.91/1A. The Tahsildar, Bengaluru East Taluk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010366622012_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Assistant Commissioner's Order in Waqf Property Dispute for Violation of Natural Justice. Entry of Waqf Board's Name in Revenue Records Set Aside as Order Passed Without Notice or Hearing to Petitioner.

The petitioner, Smt. Chennamma, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, Kala...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Tenancy Declaration Dispute Based on Landlord's Admission. Landlord's admission of tenancy under Section 7-B of Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is binding and cannot be ignored by appellate authorities.

The petitioner, Meenakshi M. Gurao, claimed to be a tenant of disputed land and applied to the Tahsildar, Guhagar, on 15-6-1988 under Section 7-B of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order in Fair Price Shop Malpractice Case — Violation of Natural Justice as Complainant Not Heard. Revision Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Principles of Audi Alteram Partem Under Maharashtra Essential Commodities Act.

The petitioner, Dattatraya Marotrao Sakhare, was the original complainant who, along with other card holders from village Konatha, filed a complaint o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Notice Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 — Non-Speaking Final Notice Held Valid as No Adjudication Required at Section 6 Stage. Petitioners Failed to Exhaust Statutory Appeal Remedy Under Section 10 of the Act.

The petitioners, Karupayee and Thangamani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challengi...