Search Results for "Status Quo Order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Status Quo Order"

1692 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1692 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Regrant of Watan Land Under Maharashtra Pargana and Kulkarni Watans (Abolition) Act, 1950 — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi and Petition Barred by Delay. The court held that a subsequent purchaser cannot challenge a regrant order passed before his purchase, and the petition filed after 9 years is grossly delayed.

3 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Arvind Balaji Walvekar, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 25 August 2009 passed by the Minister (Revenue) rejecting hi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Temporary Injunction in Property Dispute — Sale During Pendency of Suit Held Subject to Lis Pendens. The Court upheld the concurrent findings of the trial and appellate courts that the purchasers failed to establish a prima facie case for injunction as the sale was hit by lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

28 Nov 2013

The petitioners, Manoj Ratilalbhai Chouhan and his wife Rajashri, filed a suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction in respect of Sho...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears writ petitions and appeals challenging the Government Order dated 12 August 2008 that handed over the administration of Sri Mahabaleshwara Devaru Temple, Gokarna to Sri Ramachandrapura Mutt. The court examines the legality of the order under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, relevant endowments laws, and Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.

10 Aug 2018

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Pronounces CAV Order in Writ Petition Against Encroachment Removal Orders Under Panchayat Raj Rules. Petitioners Alleged to Have Suppressed Material Facts and Withdrawn Civil Suit.

13 Mar 2026

The Petitioners, Smt. Hombalamma and Sri Appaji, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Contempt Petition Filed Against Municipal Officials for Alleged Violation of Court Order; Court Examines Procedural Requirement of Notice. The Court Analysed the Bombay High Court Rules Regarding Contempt Proceedings and Held That the Initial Notice under Rule 8 is Sufficient for Proceeding with the Contempt Petition.

4 Aug 2006

The contempt petition arose from a property dispute between a charitable trust, Saurashtra Vanza Gnyati Yuvak Mandal, and the Municipal Corporation of...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Challenging CLB Order Allowing Ingress into Plant Disputed under Business Transfer Agreement. Court Notes Contradictory Affidavits and Abuse of Process by Appellant in Claiming Possession.

30 Nov 2015

The appeal arose from a Company Law Board order allowing Respondent No. 2, Rajinder Kumar Malhotra (RKM), access to Plant No. 2 of Vidyut Metallics Pv...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Condonation of 9-Year Delay in Recall Application in Suit Withdrawal Case — Unconditional Withdrawal Under Order XXIII Rule 1(1) CPC is Plaintiff's Absolute Right. The court held that the plaintiff's right to unconditionally withdraw a suit is absolute and cannot be fettered by the court, and a delay of over 9 years in seeking recall of such an order cannot be condoned without sufficient cause.

21 Feb 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Vaishnavi Engineers and Developers Private Limited, had filed a suit (RCS No. 782 of 2012) against the respondents seeking declar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Declares Land Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Due to Non-Compliance with Time Limit. Award Excluding Subject Lands and Subsequent Inaction for Over Two Decades Leads to Lapsing of Acquisition Proceedings.

11 Dec 2024

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Laxman Mahadev Katkar, challenged the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Ma...

High Court

High Court Examines Whether Minister Can Drop Land Acquisition After Award and Dismissal of Landowner’s Challenge. Matter Concerns Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Power of Acquiring Authority to Object.

6 Oct 2017

The petitioner, City & Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO), acting as the New Town's Development Authority under the Maharashtra Regional & Tow...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Government Order on Mahabaleshwara Temple Administration. Dispute Pertains to Control and Management of Temple as per Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950.

10 Aug 2018

...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)