Search Results for "Section 65-B Indian Evidence Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Section 65-B Indian Evidence Act"

114 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 114 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows TIIC's Recovery Petition Against Guarantors in SFC Act Case — Guarantors Held Jointly and Severally Liable Despite Company's Winding Up. Liability of Guarantors Under Sections 31(a) and 31(aa) of State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 Survives Liquidation of Principal Borrower and Receipt of Amount from Official Liquidator.

7 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Limited (TIIC), a State Financial Corporation, filed an original petition under Sections ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Extra-Judicial Confession and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole reliance on extra-judicial confession without independent corroboration found unsafe.

31 Jan 2024

The appellant, Arjun Ishwara Gejage, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Satara, for the murder of a person on 18th February 2014. The prosecution ca...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Divorce Decree on Ground of Cruelty in Hindu Marriage Act Case. Husband's Appeal Dismissed as Court Finds Sufficient Evidence of Mental Cruelty and Failure to Return Streedhan.

24 Mar 2023

The case involves an appeal by the husband against a Family Court decree dissolving his marriage on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of t...

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Dowry Harassment Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Testimonies. Conviction under Sections 498-A and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

4 Nov 2022

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Punit Rajput and Godavari Rajput against their conviction under Sections 498-A and 302 of the Indian P...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reviews Challenge to CCI Investigation Order in Online Marketplaces Case — Petitioners Contend Lack of Prima Facie Opinion and Appreciable Adverse Effect on Competition Under Section 26(1) of Competition Act, 2002.

11 Jun 2021

The dispute involves writ petitions filed by Amazon Seller Services Private Limited and Flipkart Internet Private Limited, challenging an order dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

3 Nov 2020

The appellants, Shrinivas @ Shenu Shirsappa Ayyappa Swami and Vyankatesh @ Vyankati Narsimallu Sagar, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge,...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Application Under Section 482 CrPC Seeking Quashing of Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Applicant Challenges Vicarious Liability Under Section 141 and Compliance with Section 202 CrPC Inquiry in Cheque Dishonour Case.

13 Oct 2017

The applicant preferred a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the proceedings in a complaint u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CBFC Cuts Imposed on Film on Drug Addiction; Holds Pre-Censorship Must Conform to Article 19(2) Reasonable Restrictions. State's Decision to Delete References to Punjab and Mutilate Content Violates Freedom of Speech Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

13 Jun 2016

The first petitioner, a film production company, sought a writ of certiorari to quash the decision of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Award Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Consideration of Evidence. The court held that denial of cross-examination and failure to consider electronic evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act, 1872, renders an arbitral award patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

29 Apr 2016

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Distributorship Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Profits for Period Without Written Agreement. The court held that the arbitrator's finding that no implied contract existed for the period 14th June 2006 to 31st March 2007 was not perverse or against public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Diversey India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitr...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)