Search Results for "Section 212 IPC"

137 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 137 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Witnesses Turned Hostile and Circumstantial Evidence Lacked Corroboration.

The appellant, Muthukumar, was convicted by the Fast Track Mahalir Court, Ramanathapuram, for the murder of his wife, Pon Irul, under Section 302 IPC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted by Calcutta High Court in Jnaneshwari Express Derailment Case — CBI Investigation Undermined by Premature Release. Reverse Burden of Proof Under Section 436A CrPC Not Applicable Where Investigation Ongoing and Trial Not Commenced.

The Supreme Court heard appeals by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against the grant of bail to multiple accused persons in connection with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Benefit of Doubt on Juvenile Status and Inconsistent Evidence. Claim of juvenility at time of offence not properly considered; conviction under Sections 302, 307 read with 34 IPC set aside.

The appellant, Channappa, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yadgir, in S.C. No. 40/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 307, 302 read with 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness and Inadmissible CCTV Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Insufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 364, 302, 201, 212 and 120-B of IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Randeep Singh @ Rana and another appellant against their conviction for murder and related offences. The case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Accused to Adduce Defence Evidence in POCSO Case — Rejection of Plea by Trial Court Set Aside. Right to Fair Trial Under Section 482 CrPC Includes Opportunity to Present Defence Witnesses Even After Prosecution Evidence Closed.

The petitioner, Sri Periyaswamy M., filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) before the High Court o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dowry Harassment and Abetment to Suicide Case — Demand for Rs. 5,000 for Electric Motor Not Sufficient to Constitute Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC. Suicide by Consuming Poison Held Not Abetted Under Section 306 IPC as No Instigation or Active Role Proven.

The appellants, Ankush, Raosaheb, and Bhausaheb Gajar, were convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna, for offences under Sections 306, 49...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application and Discharges Applicant in Harbouring Case Due to Lack of Evidence. No prima facie case under Section 212 IPC made out as chargesheet and statements failed to show any connection of the applicant with the alleged harbouring of accused.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Govindkumar s/o Ramprakash Agrawal against the order dated 16.9.2004 passed by the 1st Ad-h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application Challenging Bail Cancellation in Criminal Case Due to Addition of Further Offence. Addition of Section 307 IPC after bail justified cancellation as it indicated potential for further offences.

The applicant, Sarang Arvind Goswamy, filed a criminal application challenging the order of the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Pune dated 14th March 2...