High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Public Interest Litigation Regarding Unspecified Government Action. The Case Involves Impleaded Respondents Including State Officials and Karnataka Public Service Commission.
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "Section 12(1)"
1958 result(s) found
Found 1958 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...
- 62
High Court
- 39
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.
3 Dec 2015The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs Pay Parity for Section Officers in High Court Administration with Mantralaya Staff. The court upheld the principle of parity of pay scales between High Court staff and State Government staff based on a 1965 agreement.
9 Aug 2016The petitioner, Shri Mahendra F. Rupwate, a Section Officer (Class II) in the office of the Registrar General of the Bombay High Court, filed a writ p...
- 128
High Court
High Court of Bombay Directs Re-adjudication of 21 Employees' Claims; Dispute on Interest and Bonus Under Winding-Up Not Resolved in Extracted Judgment Text. The court granted partial relief by allowing prayer (b) for re-adjudication of claims of 21 workmen due to discrepancies, while the final decision on prayer (a) concerning statutory interest, bonus, and provident fund contribution under the Companies Act, 1956 is not discernible from the incomplete text.
4 Aug 2006The case concerns a company application filed by the Engineering Workers Association, representing 121 employees of M/s. Poysha Industrial Co. Ltd., w...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission’s Distribution Open Access Regulations. Challenge Concerns Alleged Jurisdictional Overreach Curtailing Consumers’ Right to Access Power Exchange Under the Electricity Act, 2003.
30 Oct 2015The provided text is an incomplete extract of a judgment from the Bombay High Court in a set of writ petitions (WP Nos. 2694/2014, 2318/2014, 2294/201...
- 17
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.
1 Aug 2026The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Declines Section 11 Jurisdiction, Holds Calcutta High Court Appropriate When Earlier Section 9 Application Filed Before City Civil Court, Kolkata. The Court applies Ravi Ranjan principle, holding that the High Court exercising supervisory jurisdiction over the district court first moved under the Act is the correct Section 11 court, even if the parties' agreement confers jurisdiction on another High Court.
12 Jun 2025The case arose from loan agreements between Tata Motors Finance Solution Ltd (now merged into Tata Capital Limited) and Parbez Hamid, containing arbit...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeals in Confiscation of Pay Orders — Genuine Foreign Exchange Transactions Not Sale Proceeds of Smuggled Goods. Pay orders received by FFMC for sale of foreign exchange in genuine transactions cannot be confiscated under Section 121 of the Customs Act, 1962 merely because the purchaser's bank account contained proceeds of smuggling.
30 Mar 2012The appellant, Weizmann Limited, a Full Fledged Money Changer (FFMC), sold foreign exchange to various purchasers and received pay orders from banks. ...
- 68
