Search Results for "Punjab Industrial Tribunal"

588 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 588 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Industrial Dispute Case — Reinstatement Ordered with Continuity of Service but Without Back Wages. Daily Wage Worker's Termination Held Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The appellant, Chandrakant Prabhakar Jadhav, was a daily wage worker appointed by the State of Maharashtra (Public Works Division) on 1 July 1984. He ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petitions Challenging Reinstatement Orders for Daily-Wage Employees. Termination of daily-wage employees without compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal, and reinstatement with back wages is proper remedy.

The case involves four writ petitions arising from service disputes between the Maharashtra State Khadi and Village Industries Board (the employer) an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Applicability of Employees' Provident Funds Act to Pigmy Agents of Cooperative Banks. Writ Petitions Filed by Both Banks and Provident Fund Authorities Challenge Tribunal Orders on Coverage of Such Agents Under Section 18(3)(d) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

A group of writ petitions came before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, filed by multiple cooperative banks and by the Assistant Provident Fund Com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Service Matter Due to Failure to Frame Preliminary Issues in Disciplinary Enquiry. Labour Court and Industrial Court Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Pralhad Waman Lahane, was employed as a Banking Inspector at the Jalna District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. He joined as a Clerk on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.

The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Bus Conductor in MSRTC Misappropriation Case. Labour Court's refusal to interfere with punishment of dismissal for collecting Rs.14/- but issuing Rs.5/- ticket and having cash excess of Rs.11/- is confirmed as not perverse.

The petitioner, Rohidas Premchand Bhagat, was employed as a bus conductor with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) since 1 Novemb...