Search Results for "Presumption Under Section 139"

476 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 476 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure of Consideration. Complainant failed to prove legally enforceable debt as share transfer was not completed under MOU.

The case involves two appeals filed by Harendra Ramchandra Pathak (complainant) against the acquittal of Dharmendra Ratan Mhatre and Rajendra Ratan Mh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused Who Did Not Enter Witness Box. Acquittal Set Aside as Perverse; Accused Convicted and Fined ₹2,50,000 with Compensation to Complainant.

The appellant, Ivan Singh, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Shivaji Tukaram Naik, by the Judicial Magistrate First Cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses High Court Conviction Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Accused's Defence of Blank Cheque Misuse and Absence of Loan Disbursement Raises Probable Doubt, Rebutting Presumption Under Section 139.

The case involves a criminal appeal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The appellant, ANSS Rajashekar, was accused by the resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction Under Section 138 N.I. Act — Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Cheques Were Issued as Security, Leading to Confirmation of Sentence of Simple Imprisonment and Compensation.

The applicant, Rekha Mahindra Shah, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of three cheques totaling Rs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies once cheque and signature are admitted, shifting burden on accused to rebut existence of debt.

The appellant, Nitin Bapurao Mankar, was the original complainant in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies when cheque and signature are admitted, shifting burden on accused to prove defence.

The case involves a criminal appeal filed by the complainant, Sukhalal Kumar, against the acquittal of the accused, Prakash B. Borkar, under Section 1...