Search Results for "Panchayat approval"

418 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 418 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Proof of Demand. Demand of bribe not established beyond reasonable doubt as panch witness turned hostile and complainant's testimony was inconsistent under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, a Senior Clerk in the Taluka Panchayat Office, Bhuj, who was charged un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recall of Disqualification in Grampanchayat Election Expense Case. Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi Under Section 14B(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Balaji Ganpati Pawar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 23rd August 2008 passed by the Sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lokayukta Investigation for Lack of Prior Sanction Under Section 17-A of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Investigation conducted without mandatory prior approval from competent authority held null and void.

The petitioners, three public servants employed with the Pattana Panchayat, Jagalur, Davangere District, filed a writ petition before the High Court o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes AICTE Closure Order for Retrospective Application of Norms and Violation of Natural Justice. AICTE's Approval Process Handbook Norms Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to College Established in 1992.

The case involves a college established by a Trust in 1992 with initial approval from AICTE. The college expanded and shifted its campus over time. Af...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes GCZMA Demolition Order for Lack of Quorum and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's 18 rooms saved as sub-committee meeting with only 4 members violated requirement of 5 members for cases directed by High Court.

The petitioner, Shri Sylvestre D'Souza, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 15/02...