Search Results for "Order XXIII"

433 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 433 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appellant's Letters Patent Appeals in Land Dispute, Upholding Single Judge's Order. Delay Condonation Denied as Unexplained; Appeals Found Devoid of Merit on Substance.

The judgment pertains to two Letters Patent Appeals filed by Vasharambhai Sagharambhai Bharvad against a common judgment and order dated 16.10.2025 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Contract Dispute — Continuous Cause of Action Does Not Require Fresh Notice Under Section 80 CPC. The court upheld the High Court's order permitting amendment to bring subsequent debarment orders on record, as they arose from the same cause of action.

The dispute arose from a tender floated by the Superintending Engineer, PWD, Kolkata on 04.12.2013 for strengthening the Howrah-Amta Road. The respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Shareholder Dispute Over Share Transfer Agreement — Agreement dated 14th June 2019 Held Valid and Enforceable.

The dispute arises out of a Share Purchase Agreement dated 14th June 2019 between the Kamdar Group (appellants) and the Sanghvi Group (respondents) fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Summary Suit Withdrawal Case. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Requires Express Liberty for Fresh Suit, but Withdrawal Order Did Not Bar Fresh Suit as It Was Not a Judgment.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) filed by the applicants (original defendan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Beneficiaries in Trust Petition — Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Applies. Court holds that persons claiming beneficial interest under a trust are necessary and proper parties to a trust petition under Section 41A of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the petitioner, Harishchandra Amarnath Puri, in a Trust Petition (No. 1 of 2017) pending before the Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Execution of Consent Decree in Commercial Suit — Decree Not Null and Void Despite Alleged Non-Compliance with Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. Court Holds That a Consent Decree Can Be Executed Even If It Contains Terms Beyond the Suit, Provided Parties Freely Consented.

The case arises from a commercial suit (Suit No. 119 of 2016) filed by Mahesh P. Raheja, Preeti P. Raheja, and Shakuntala P. Raheja (Respondent Nos. 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Compromise Decree Valid Despite Alleged Fraud. Court holds that a compromise decree can only be challenged on limited grounds of fraud or coercion, and failure to prove such grounds results in dismissal of appeal.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a partition suit. The original plaintiff, Pandurang Shidu Chinchkar, filed Regular Civil Suit No. 324 o...