Search Results for "Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979"

110 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 110 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Gratuity from Date of Retirement in Corruption Case Acquittal. Interest under Section 7(3A) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 is payable from retirement date, not acquittal date, as gratuity becomes due on retirement regardless of pending criminal prosecution.

The petitioner, Vinodkumar Narayan Dixit, a former Deputy Collector, retired on 1st April 1997 while a criminal prosecution under the Prevention of Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Retired Executive Engineer Challenging Censure Order. Censure Order Quashed as Disproportionate and Based on Stale Allegations from 1971-1974.

The petitioner, Manohar Ganpatrao Kapsikar, a retired Executive Engineer, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Maharashtra Administra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After Retirement. Disciplinary proceedings cannot be initiated after an employee's retirement unless permitted by statutory rules or pension regulations.

The petitioner, a Civil Engineer employed with the Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation, was issued a show cause notice on 30.3.2007, just before his reti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Primary Teacher Dismissed for Moral Turpitude and Bigamy. Departmental Enquiry Upheld Despite Criminal Acquittal as Standard of Proof Differs.

The petitioner, Rabhaji Ananda Kulange, was a primary teacher employed by the Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar since 6/7/1979. He was served a charge sheet ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Extra Departmental Agent Challenging Dismissal for Misappropriation. Departmental Enquiry Charge of Misappropriating Rs.100 Proved by Preponderance of Probabilities, No Perversity Found.

The petitioner, Ramdas Shankarrao Digraskar, was appointed as an Extra Departmental Agent (E.D.A.) on 5.8.1983 and later promoted to Extra Departmenta...