Search Results for "MRTU and PULP Act"

527 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 527 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Permanency for Hospital Employee — Industrial Court's Finding of No Continuous Service Upheld. Employee Failed to Establish 240 Days of Work in 12 Months Under Section 5-B of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Kumar Dashrath Kamble, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the judgment and order dated 3 May 2023 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Petition Against Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Workers Entitled to Regularisation and Equal Pay for Same Work Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The case involves a Writ Petition filed by Solapur Mahanagarpalika (Municipal Corporation) under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Industrial Court's Order Granting Permanency to Contract Labourers. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Contractor Deployment Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s Uni Klinger Ltd., challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Ahmednagar dated 28.08.2003, which allowed complaints filed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order That Quashed Labour Court's Decision on Date of Birth Correction. Employer Cannot Unilaterally Change Employee's Date of Birth Without Following Proper Procedure and Without Giving Opportunity of Hearing.

The petitioner, Sonabai Harchand Gurav, was employed as a Gramsevika with the Zilla Parishad, Nandurbar, on 14.01.1977. Her date of birth was recorded...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement of Operatives Under Wrong Standing Orders — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court directed to decide whether petitioners are Operatives governed by Standing Order 20-A or non-operatives under Model Standing Orders.

The petitioners, three employees of M/s Kohinoor Mills (a unit of NTC Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Interim Reinstatement Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Labour Court's Direction to Reinstate Workman with Full Wages Pending Complaint Upheld as Proper Exercise of Power Under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai dated 25th October 2005, which dismissed its revision...