Search Results for "Label"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Label"

446 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 446 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Deceptive Similarity Between STIMULIV and STIMULET for Different Pharmaceutical Products. The court held that the mark 'STIMULET' used for an allopathic breast cancer drug does not infringe the registered mark 'STIMULIV' used for Ayurvedic liver medicines due to differences in nature, trade channels, and customers under Section 29(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

20 Jan 2023

The case involves a trademark infringement and passing off dispute between two pharmaceutical companies. The appellant, Corona Remedies Private Limite...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash FIR in Sushant Singh Rajput Death Case — Allegations of Abetment to Suicide and Drug Nexus Require Investigation. Court holds that FIR prima facie discloses cognizable offences under IPC and NDPS Act, and quashing at threshold is not warranted.

15 Feb 2021

The petitioners, sisters of the deceased actor Sushant Singh Rajput, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Application for Injunction in Copyright Dispute Over Documentary Film 'Sindhustan' — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Prima Facie Case of Co-Producer or Joint Copyright Ownership. The Court held that an oral agreement for co-production is not sufficient to claim joint ownership of copyright under the Copyright Act, 1957, and that the Plaintiff's contributions did not amount to joint authorship.

11 Feb 2021

The suit was filed by Kabir Singh Chowdhry (Plaintiff) against Sapna Moti Bhavnani (Defendant No. 1) and others, seeking a declaration that the Plaint...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Indefinite Blacklisting Order for Misbranded Veterinary Medicine — Show Cause Notice Lacked Specific Warning of Blacklisting and Appellant Was Not the Direct Supplier. The Court held that an indefinite blacklisting order without proper notice and without the appellant being a direct supplier is void ab initio and cannot be sustained.

11 Dec 2020

The appellant, Vetindia Pharmaceuticals Limited, a licensed drug manufacturer, was blacklisted indefinitely by the State of Uttar Pradesh on 08.09.200...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Notification Restricting Oxytocin Manufacture to Public Sector. Notification under Section 26A of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 held invalid for being arbitrary and disproportionate to the objective of curbing misuse.

22 Aug 2019

The case involves a challenge to a notification issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Mehandi Manufacturer for Lack of Sanction Under Section 32 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. Sanction order found to be cyclostyled proforma without application of mind, rendering prosecution invalid.

28 Sep 2016

The applicants, Chutararam and Jetharam Gehlot, were the proprietors of 'Prem Mehandi Center', a small manufacturer of henna/mehandi powder and cone p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interlocutory Application in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'CHERI' vs 'MULTI CHERRY' — Preliminary Issue Under Section 9A CPC Pending. The court declined to hear the ad-interim application due to procedural bars: the Appeal Court's order in the Clause XIV leave appeal and the Defendants' application for a preliminary issue on jurisdiction under Section 9A CPC.

24 Jun 2015

The Plaintiffs, Indchemie Health Specialties Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal Against Acquittal in Essential Commodities Act Case — Conviction Restored for Selling Wheat Flour Above Controlled Price. Violation of Maharashtra Essential Commodities (Display of Price and Stocks) Order, 1977 and Section 3 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 Established.

7 Dec 2006

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of Sunil Bansilal Jain and Bansilal Dagadulal Jain, who were vendors of a kirana shop a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Counterfeit Coin Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 232 and 235 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Possession or Control Over Premises and Seized Articles.

4 Oct 2006

The appellant, Shahid Sultan Khan, was convicted by the adhoc Additional District and Sessions Judge, Thane, under Sections 232 and 235 of the Indian ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition Challenging Election on Ground of Office of Profit — Chairman of Goa Khadi and Village Industries Board Not an Office of Profit Under Article 191(1)(a) of Constitution. The court held that the Board is a statutory body with independent funds and the Chairman's honorarium does not constitute profit.

27 May 2005

The petitioner, an unsuccessful candidate in the 2002 Goa Legislative Assembly election for the Siolim constituency, filed an election petition under ...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)