Search Results for "Kotak Mahindra Bank"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "Kotak Mahindra Bank"

143 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 143 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders Under SARFAESI Act, Holding That Section 14 Orders Are Administrative and Not Subject to Appeal Under Section 18. The court clarified that the remedy against a Section 14 order lies only by way of writ petition under Article 226/227, and the DRT has no power to review or recall its own Section 14 order.

12 Dec 2025

The Bombay High Court dealt with a batch of writ petitions and interim applications challenging orders passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Writ Petition Against State Consumer Commission's Order Directing District Commission to Decide Complaint. Petitioner Challenges Order Allowing Revision Petition Under Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

16 Apr 2025

The writ petition arose from an order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench, Nagpur, which allowed a revision petition an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Warrant of Attachment in Execution Proceedings Due to Approved Resolution Plan Under IBC. The court held that the MSEFC award was subsumed by the NCLT-approved resolution plan, which provided for 15% payment of the claim, and the execution could not proceed for the full award amount.

18 Mar 2024

The case involves an execution application filed by Mars Art Studio (the judgment creditor) against Shirdi Industries Limited (the judgment debtor) to...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Anti-Suit Injunction Restraining Former Employees from Pursuing Foreign Proceedings in Breach of Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause. Employment contracts containing forum selection clauses designating Indian courts as exclusive forum are enforceable, and breach thereof constitutes a clear case for anti-suit injunction to protect the sanctity of contracts and prevent multiplicity of proceedings.

4 Oct 2023

The plaintiff, SNV Aviation Private Limited, filed multiple suits and interim applications against its former employees (defendants) who had executed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Based on Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator. Unilateral Appointment Does Not Violate Section 12(5) Read with Seventh Schedule When Arbitrator Not Disqualified and Objection Waived by Participation.

1 Mar 2023

The petitioners, Hanuman Motors Pvt. Ltd. and another, challenged an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator appointed by the respondent, M/s. Tata...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Receiver and Injunction in Loan Default Case. Loan Agreement and Mortgage by Deposit of Title Deeds Established Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Aditya Birla Finance Limited, a non-banking finance company, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Tribunal's Order Upheld for Lack of Substantial Question of Law. Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for alleged concealment of income was deleted by the Tribunal on finding no deliberate concealment.

11 Sep 2013

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Mortgage Dispute — Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Upheld Despite Lack of Pre-Appointment Notice. The court held that a claim for enforcement of a mortgage is arbitrable as it is in personam, and Section 21 of the Arbitration Act does not require notice before appointment when the agreement provides for unilateral appointment.

25 Jul 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a Learned Single Judge dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, chall...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Objection Raised Before Arbitrator on Appointment or Disclosure, Interest Rate Upheld as Within Contractual Terms.

28 Jan 2013

The petitioner, D.Virendra & Co. & Ors., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 in the Bombay High Court challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging BIFR Order in SICA Reference — Holds That BIFR Cannot Reopen a Duly Sanctioned Scheme Without Jurisdiction Under Section 18 of SICA. The court quashed the BIFR order reopening a sanctioned scheme, ruling that the BIFR lacks inherent powers to review or modify a final scheme under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985.

25 Apr 2011

The petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, challenged an order dated 25.1.2011 passed by the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)