Search Results for "Konkan Railway"

117 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 117 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice and Public Policy. Failure to Provide Opportunity to Cross-Examine Key Witness and Non-Consideration of Vital Evidence Renders Award Patently Illegal.

The appellant, M/s Leaf Bio-Tech Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the order of the Ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Bank of India's Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Loan Dispute. Dispute Referred to Arbitration Despite Respondent's Claim of Non-Signatory Status, with Jurisdictional Issue Left to Arbitrator.

The judgment arises from a petition filed by Bank of India under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award; Limits Court Intervention in Arbitration Scope of judicial intervention in arbitration is limited under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Acts and Sections Discussed: Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34: Application for setting aside an arbitral award. Section 37: Ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reviews Remand Authority in Mumbai Slum Redevelopment Dispute. Key Decision on Appellate Powers and Arbitral Award Validity in Complex Multi-Party Case

The Supreme Court is addressing appeals concerning a High Court judgment on a slum redevelopment project in Mumbai. The case involves various parties,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal in Arbitration Dispute, Restoring Arbitral Award Modified by Lower Courts. Judicial Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is Limited, and Courts Cannot Re-appreciate Evidence or Modify Awards on Merits.

The dispute arose from a construction contract between a civil engineering contractor and the Karnataka State Public Works Department for building off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Non-Compliance with Section 31(2) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Signed by Only Two of Three Arbitrators Without Recording Reason for Omitted Signature

The petitioner, Ashesh Busa, proprietor of Apex Chemicals, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute — Petitioner's Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Fails. Court Held That Arbitrator's Findings on Breach and Quantum Were Not Patently Illegal or Against Public Policy.

The petitioner, M/s Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an ar...