Search Results for "Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003"

231 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 231 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Service Tax on Restaurant Services as Valid Exercise of Union Legislative Power. Service Tax on Supply of Food and Drinks in Restaurants is Not a Tax on Sale of Goods but a Tax on Service, Falling Under Entry 97 of List I.

The case involves two intra-court appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, challenging a learned Single Judge's common order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in KVAT Penalty Case — Penalty Under Section 70(2)(a) Cannot Be Imposed Without Specific Finding of Mens Rea or Fraudulent Intent. Revisional Authority's Restoration of Penalty Set Aside as Assessee Had Disclosed Purchases in Returns and Paid Tax.

The case involves an appeal filed by M/s Bhavani Enterprises, a registered dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, against an order of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Legality of Penalty Imposed Under Section 10(b) of CST Act for Misuse of C-Forms in Cement Industry. Court Examines Whether Penalty is Sustainable When Purchased Goods Are Included in Registration Certificate and Used for Purposes Other Than Manufacturing.

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, heard a sales tax appeal and connected revision petitions concerning the levy of penalty under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Penalty Under Section 10(b) of CST Act for Alleged Misuse of C-Forms. The Court Examined Whether Penalty is Leviable When Goods Were Covered in Registration Certificate and There Was No Dishonest Intention.

The combined proceeding involved appeals and revision petitions against orders relating to penalty under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Two dealers,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order Under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Rejecting Settlement Application for Non-Disclosure of Full Income.

The petitioner, Major Metals Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30 December 2010 passed by t...