Search Results for "Karnataka High Court Arbitration Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Karnataka High Court Arbitration Rules"

184 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 184 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Upholds Commercial Court's Refusal to Set Aside Award. The court held that the arbitral tribunal's findings on contractual interpretation and quantum of damages were within its jurisdiction and not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

18 Jun 2026

The National Centre for Biological Sciences (NCBS) filed a commercial appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, cha...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Court upholds award of ₹3,52,50,404/- for unpaid work, rejecting challenge on grounds of erroneous interpretation of contract and evidence.

18 Jun 2026

The National Centre for Biological Sciences (NCBS) filed a commercial appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, cha...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Upholds Commercial Court's Refusal to Set Aside Award. NCBS's challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 fails as no grounds under Section 34(2) established.

18 Jun 2026

The National Centre for Biological Sciences (NCBS) filed an appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A&C Act) agai...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Commercial Court Order and Restores Arbitral Award in Service Agreement Dispute Over Witness Competence Issue. Commercial Court Erred in Finding Patent Illegality Based on Inadmissibility of Authorized Representative's Evidence Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as Witness Competence Relates to Evidence Appreciation, Not Fundamental Legal Error.

10 Feb 2026

The dispute originated from a Master Service Agreement dated 11.04.2019  where Appellant agreed to provide temporary delivery executives to Swigg...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Appellants' Application Under Order 21 Rules 97, 98, 101 CPC Rejected by Executing Court Set Aside. Court Holds That Executing Court Must Determine Rights of Third Parties Claiming Independent Possession Under Order 21 Rule 101 CPC Before Confirming Sale.

19 Sep 2022

The present appeal was filed by the appellants, who were the legal heirs of the original judgment-debtor, Hiranappa (since deceased), and other family...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision Quashing Labour Cess Demand Under Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Cess Act, 1996. The Court held that the cess demand was invalid as the contract work did not constitute 'building or other construction work' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996, and the levy under Sections 3(1) and (2) of the Cess Act was not applicable.

12 May 2021

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil appellate jurisdiction, addressed a special leave petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Sales Tax Dispute Over Time Charter Agreement — Holds That Time Charter Is a Service Contract, Not Transfer of Right to Use Goods. The Court ruled that a time charter does not involve transfer of possession or control, thus not taxable under Section 5C of Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

4 Dec 2019

The appellant, The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd., owned a tug named 'Kumari Tarini' and entered into a Time Charter Agreement dated 8.1.1998 with th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging KAT Order in Service Matter — Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Grounds for Interference Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

21 Feb 2017

The petitioner, Veeranna Basappa Yallali, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karna...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act — Upholds Arbitral Award Granting Interest on Delayed Payments. Court holds that award of interest at 18% per annum is not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 Jul 2016

The case involves an appeal by Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (Appellant) against the rejection of its petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and C...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Company Law Board Order in Oppression and Mismanagement Case — Upholds CLB's Discretion to Grant Interim Relief Under Section 402 of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that the CLB has wide powers to pass interim orders to prevent oppression and mismanagement, and such orders are not final determinations of rights.

13 Aug 2013

The Union of India, through the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, filed an appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, against an interim order ...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)