Search Results for "ITAT orders"

328 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 328 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes ITAT's Rectification Order in Income Tax Case — Tribunal Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 254(2) by Reviewing Its Own Decision. Mistake Apparent from Record Must Be Obvious and Not Require Re-appreciation of Evidence.

The petitioner, M/s. I.G. Petrochemicals Ltd., an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 05.09.202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in Income Tax Matter. Jurisdiction lies with High Court where Assessing Officer is located, not where ITAT Bench sits.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Panaji Bench, which had ru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka considers power of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to direct fresh enquiry under Section 254 of Income Tax Act, 1961 in a buy-back taxation case. The court formulates the substantial question of law regarding suo motu directions leading to potential enhancement of tax liability.

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning the tax treatment of a buy-ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Interest Income Classification. Interest income from bank deposits, intercorporate deposits, call money, debentures, and from Income Tax Department held not to be business income for deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Revenue Department filed appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals, Upholding Tax Deduction at Source Under Section 194H on Discounts to Distributors. Relationship Between Telecom Companies and Distributors Held to Be Principal-Agent, Making Discounts Liable as Commission for Tax Deduction Purposes.

Multiple telecom companies, including Bharti Airtel Limited, Vodafone Essar South Limited, and Tata Teleservices Limited, filed appeals under Section ...